would you recommend this story?

 

User Rating

Leave a Comment or

Rank filter

Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.
Posted by Mike Mariani MD, FAAP 03/23/08 19:55
Rank: 2.75/5 after 4 votes
How lacking in actual science is this report!
So, new calculations produced revised theories ruling out the prior ones. Fantabulous!
One is curious about the next revision... will the evolution of life be ruled out?
Oh... just intelligent life.
Posted by nilbud 03/23/08 22:06
Rank: 3/5 after 1 vote
250 million years ago is a bit tricky detail wise and ruling out hypothesis is the path to theories.
Posted by MrFred 03/24/08 02:04
Rank: 1.33/5 after 3 votes
Worldwide flood? Of course, being modern scientists that we are, we would have to reject that idea because of its ties to that bible story...
Posted by trantor 03/24/08 06:54
Rank: 3.33/5 after 3 votes
MrFred, it seems you are being ironic.

Notice that if there was a global flood, there would be no reason for the death of 95% of marine life. Also, such theory is invalid simply because the idea that so much water can appear from nowhere and disappear again is ludicrous!
Posted by p1ll 03/24/08 10:47
Rank: 1/5 after 1 vote
MrFred, Isn't thatwhat global warming alarmists want us to believe?? hehe ;)(worldwide flooding)
Posted by mabarker 04/01/08 10:55
Not rated yet.
Hey tran toar - "such theory is invalid simply because the idea that so much water can appear from nowhere and disappear again is ludicrous!" Thanks for this quote - it's classic -I'm going to use it in my presentations.
BTW - There's a planet in our solar system where exactly such a thing happened - it's called Mars. Atheists look at Mars and say it's obvious - massive flooding on almost a global scale. What's ironic is Mars is bone dry. These same scientists are standing on a planet that's 73% water and declare it's 'unscientific' to suggest a worldwide flood (Genesis 6 - 9).

Relevant Stories