![]() |
|
|
|
|
||
|
Volume 7 Issue 1
|
January 2003
(revised March 2005)
|
![]() |
|
Are mid-wattage metal halide lamps a cost-effective option?According to manufacturers, the new pulse-start metal halide (MH) lamps cost less to own than probe-start MH lamps, because the total cost includes both initial and operating costs. Compared to probe-start MH systems, fewer pulse-start lamps are required, which means fewer luminaires and, thus, require less installation labor. Better energy efficiency and fewer lamps reduce energy costs during operation. Longer lamp life and better lumen maintenance mean less frequent relamping, which reduces labor costs. In retrofits, where the use of fewer luminaires may not be an option, manufacturers suggest replacing probe-start MH lamps with lower wattage pulse-start MH lamps. For example, manufacturers recommend that a 320 W pulse-start MH lamp replace an existing 400 watt probe-start MH lamp. NLPIP testing showed that, for a given manufacturer, there was no obvious difference between 320 W pulse-start and 400 W probe-start MH lamps in terms of absolute lumens at 40% rated life, even though there were differences in terms of lumen maintenance (see Figure 6).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||